Before flash drought
Higher footprint and larger hull volume, with a denser pre-stress canopy.
Time-series Report
This hosted report keeps the full drought comparison in one place: the trusted local trait export, the masks and overlays used to audit the geometry, and the per-scan artifacts that explain how the canopy opened up over time.
The later scan is shorter, more open, and more fragmented. The updated 3D export shows lower support-plane height, lower footprint, and lower hull volume, which fits a canopy that contracted and lost cohesive spatial spread after the flash-drought treatment.
| Date | Scan | Height | Footprint | Hull volume | Leaf clumps | Mask overlap | Green points | Trust |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Mar 2026 | Flash drought — Flea Hot flash drought | 39.7 cm | 0.3390 m² | 0.0880 m³ | 23 | 19.4% | 98.0% | Trusted |
| 7 Apr 2026 | Flash drought — Flea Hot flash drought | 27.5 cm | 0.2270 m² | 0.0300 m³ | 22 | 7.7% | 97.5% | Trusted |
Interactive 3D Comparison
These browser viewers use the point-cloud and mesh layers exported by the same drought analysis. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, and switch modes to compare structural spread, convex hull extent, vertical profile, and color-derived greenness between the two scans.
Higher footprint and larger hull volume, with a denser pre-stress canopy.
Shorter and visibly contracted, with a markedly reduced footprint and hull volume.
This interactive comparison gives a browser-friendly way to inspect the same 3D exports used in the analysis. Turn the photogrammetry mesh on as a base layer, adjust its opacity, and then compare RGB structure, convex hull extent, height, greenness, and leaf-label overlays on top.
Before Flash Drought
Photogrammetry mesh export from the initial chamber scan.
After 4 Days of Flash Drought
Photogrammetry mesh export from the later chamber scan after the treatment window.